You are currently browsing the tag archive for the 'cognitive approximation' tag.

So, the real job hunting has begun—it had to. Caught in my daily activities (important, though, as they relate to my imminent move), I have almost forgotten what it means to persistently look for certain librarian positions, this search being a nerve-wracking game. From this distance, and from my experience, it seems that I will most likely find something through informal channels.

 

Will not forget an idea, or it is perhaps a combination of several ideas leading to one, derived from my mockery of social Darwinism: it’s not the smartest, or the most capable, who survives, but the one who can easily adapt. That would not pass in the elitist circles of our so-called meritocratic society. Or would it?

 

 Still, there is another thought I meant to put into writing these days, but it seemed so hard to pin down: I’m coining the discourse instability. To begin with, our thoughts are mostly built on words, so the more words we have stored through education, the finer is our capacity to express thoughts. Nothing new here, obviously. In writing, though, if we have the time and willingness to learn new words, we can almost perfectly tailor them to follow thoughts, since we can consult a dictionary, or a thesaurus, hoping to match words and sentences with our thoughts (at least, it is reasonable to hold this belief). What about speech? In this case, because we hardly have the capacity to remember, or remember to use, that lexical and syntactic variety that some of us can access, then we are prone to gross cognitive approximations (in the kind of societies where the written culture is so entrenched).  

 

With the exception of wishfully knowing as many concrete nouns and verbs as we can, which is already a prowess–the educated unilinguals’ one of the finest qualities–, we may feel almost helpless in trying to reach the rest of the words, if they exist, lying somewhere in a deep, almost inaccessible well. My take is that only constant reading and, especially, writing will refine our ability to effectively tap into, or fill, that well; otherwise, we resort for groping for the only few words residing in our short term memory, as if our body, or biological self,  tires if does not exercise–an apparent paradox here.  That is to say, the discourse instability may reflect a lack of practice, the opposite of which (that is, practicing to stabilize the speech) only a chosen few can afford regularly. Some of them may find the social Darwinism quite acceptable.